Reverse-cycle aircon vs gas heating: which is really cheaper to run? Reverse cycle usually wins — but it's not a reason to rip out working gas.
A modern reverse-cycle air conditioner is a heat pump: it moves heat rather than burning fuel, so it delivers three to four-and-a-half units of warmth per unit of electricity while even the best gas heater tops out near 90%. On Victorian and ACT government figures that makes it cheaper to run than gas for most households in most states. The honest catch: the gap narrows where gas is cheap and peak-only power is dear, cold climates need a cold-rated unit, and the higher upfront cost takes a few years to repay — so it’s a clear win when buying new, not a reason to scrap a working gas heater mid-life.
Reviewed by the Mission Green Energy Team · Updated July 2026
Is reverse cycle really
cheaper to run than gas?
The short, honest answer — before the physics and the numbers.
For most Australian homes, yes. A reverse-cycle air conditioner is a heat pump: it doesn’t make heat, it moves it, so it delivers roughly three to four-and-a-half units of warmth for every unit of electricity. Even the best correctly installed gas heater tops out near 90% efficient. On Victorian and ACT government modelling that makes reverse cycle cheaper to run than gas — in the order of $191–395 a year to heat a room versus roughly $579–866 a year on gas.
But this is an amber verdict, not a slam-dunk. It’s a clear win when you’re buying new, replacing a dying heater, or heating with your own solar. It is not a reason to rip out a working gas heater mid-life — the running-cost saving takes years to repay the cost of a new unit. And the advantage narrows where gas is cheap and you’re on expensive peak-only power. If you’re weighing up the whole switch, our electrify-your-home guide zooms out; this page is just the heating running-cost maths.
Why a heat pump beats a flame
90% versus 300-600%.
One number does the heavy lifting: efficiency.
Gas tops out near 90%
SolarQuotes puts the highest efficiency for a correctly installed, standards-compliant gas heater at about 90% — and the average existing heater at 70–80%, with some as low as 60%. Every joule you don’t use goes up the flue. A flame can never beat 100%.
300-600% effective
energy.gov.au states reverse-cycle units on the market run between roughly 300% and 600% efficient. Even the worst air conditioner delivers about 3.5 kWh of heat per kWh of electricity (about 350%); a 3.5-star unit is at least 500%. It moves heat from outside in, rather than making it.
CoP 6 uses half the energy of CoP 3
ACT Climate Choices figures put split systems at an average Coefficient of Performance around 3.7 (up to 6.4 for the best), and ducted systems around 3.5–5.0. A system with CoP 6 uses half the energy of one with CoP 3 for the same heat — so the model you pick matters.
What the government figures
actually say per year.
Two public datasets — Sustainability Victoria and ACT Climate Choices — put dollars on it.
These are modelled annual running costs at specific assumed prices, not quotes — but they’re from state governments, not sellers, and they point the same way. Sustainability Victoria’s mid-2025 figures assume 29.2c/kWh peak electricity and roughly 3.3–4.7 c/MJ gas depending on room size.
$191 reverse cycle vs $579 gas
Sustainability Victoria: a 3.0-star reverse-cycle AC costs about $191/yr, versus about $579/yr for a 4.5-star gas room heater and about $860/yr for an electric panel or fan heater. Electric resistance is the most expensive way to heat, by a wide margin.
$513-721 reverse cycle vs $1,540 gas ducted
Sustainability Victoria: a multi-split reverse-cycle system runs about $513/yr and ducted reverse cycle about $721/yr, versus about $1,540/yr for a 6-star gas ducted system and about $1,288/yr for gas hydronic. Ducted reverse cycle still undercuts ducted gas.
$244-395 reverse cycle vs $866 gas
ACT Climate Choices: an average reverse-cycle system costs about $395/yr and an efficient one about $244/yr, versus about $866/yr for a gas wall heater and about $1,462/yr for an electric element heater — a different jurisdiction, the same pattern.
Where the gap narrows
and why 'every state' is a stretch.
The reverse-cycle win is real for most households — but it is household- and location-specific, not universal.
Here’s the honesty a seller skips. SolarQuotes’ own per-capital gas prices show the gap swings a lot: gas costs about 5.6c/kWh in Melbourne, 6.9c in Perth and 8.1c in Sydney, but about 14.8c in Brisbane — while grid electricity runs 20–35c/kWh. Where you have cheap gas and you’re on expensive peak-only electricity with no solar, the running-cost advantage narrows. It rarely disappears, but ‘cheaper in every state’ is a stretch — ‘cheaper for most households in most states’ is the honest claim.
Two things swing it back in reverse cycle’s favour: solar and tariff. If you heat during the day on your own solar generation, reverse cycle gets dramatically cheaper because the electricity is near-free. And if you’re on time-of-use pricing, when you heat changes the maths — heating hard in the evening peak is the worst case, pre-heating off-peak is the best.
Does reverse cycle cope
with a real Canberra winter?
The ‘heat pumps don’t work when it’s cold’ line is dated — but the rating you buy matters.
Good units work at -10C
ACT Climate Choices states that good reverse-cycle systems work even when it’s -10°C in winter. The idea that a heat pump quits in the cold describes old technology, not a modern cold-climate unit.
Insist on an H2 / cold-rated model
ACT Climate Choices advises buyers of split systems to ask whether the unit has an H2 rating so it will heat efficiently through a Canberra winter. In Ballarat, Canberra, Hobart and the like, that rating is the box to tick — not the headline star rating.
Efficiency falls on the coldest nights
A unit’s seasonal efficiency does drop on the coldest nights, so a cold-rated model that holds its output matters more than a big number on the box. Don’t judge a cold-climate purchase by the summer cooling star rating alone.
The catch: it costs more
to buy, so timing decides it.
Running cost is only half the equation — the other half is what you pay to switch, and when.
Reverse cycle wins on running cost, but it usually costs more to buy and install — anywhere from roughly $600 for a basic single split up to around $15,000 for a ducted whole-home system, depending on size and complexity. Get several quotes; the spread is huge. Because of that upfront cost, the running-cost saving takes some years to repay — how many depends entirely on the unit price and how much you actually heat. Be wary of any ‘pays back in four years’ claim stated as fact; that figure usually compares reverse cycle to a cheap electric heater, not to gas, and it moves with price and usage.
So the timing rule is simple. Buying new, or replacing a heater that’s dying? Choose reverse cycle — the lifetime maths is clearly better. Got a working gas heater with years left in it? Ripping it out mid-life for running cost alone usually doesn’t pay. And to be clear: in an existing home a working gas heater or cooktop is not banned and doesn’t have to be removed — the honest position is just that you replace it when it dies, not before.
So — switch to reverse cycle,
or keep the gas?
Ordered by the situation you’re actually in.
If you’re buying new or your gas heater is on its last legs, go reverse cycle — the running cost is lower for most households and the lifetime maths clearly favours it, especially if you have solar. If you have cheap gas, no solar and an expensive peak-only tariff, run your own numbers before switching; the gap narrows and the upfront cost matters more. If you’re in a cold climate, insist on a cold-climate (H2) rated unit and don’t buy on the cooling star rating alone. If you have a working gas heater with years left in it, keep it — ripping it out mid-life for running cost alone usually doesn’t pay, and nothing in an existing home forces you to. Whatever you do, draught-proof and set a sensible thermostat first: it’s the cheapest kilowatt-hour you’ll ever save.
Reverse cycle vs gas heating:
your questions, answered.
For most Australian households, yes. A reverse-cycle air conditioner is a heat pump that moves heat rather than burning fuel, so it runs at roughly 300 to 600 percent efficiency, while even the best gas heater tops out near 90 percent. Sustainability Victoria and ACT Climate Choices figures put reverse-cycle room heating at roughly 191 to 395 dollars a year, versus roughly 579 to 866 dollars a year for gas. The advantage narrows where gas is cheap and you are on expensive peak-only electricity with no solar, so it is cheaper for most households in most states rather than an absolute in every case. Run your own gas rate and tariff to be sure.
On Sustainability Victoria's mid-2025 figures, a 3.0-star reverse-cycle unit heating a 30 square metre room costs about 191 dollars a year, versus about 579 dollars for a gas room heater and about 860 dollars for an electric panel heater. For a whole 100 square metre home, multi-split reverse cycle is about 513 dollars and ducted reverse cycle about 721 dollars, versus about 1,540 dollars for gas ducted. ACT Climate Choices shows a similar 50 square metre pattern: about 244 to 395 dollars for reverse cycle versus about 866 dollars for a gas wall heater. These are modelled figures at assumed prices, so treat them as a guide and confirm current numbers at the source.
Yes, if you buy the right unit. ACT Climate Choices states that good reverse-cycle systems work even when it is minus 10 degrees Celsius in winter. The key is to ask whether a split system has an H2 rating, which means it will heat efficiently through a genuinely cold winter. In places like Ballarat, Canberra and Hobart, that cold-climate rating matters more than the headline star rating, because a unit's real-world efficiency does drop on the coldest nights and a cold-rated model holds its output better. The old idea that heat pumps stop working in the cold describes dated technology, not a modern cold-climate unit.
Usually not, if the gas heater still works well and has years of life left. Reverse cycle wins on running cost, but a new unit costs anywhere from roughly 600 dollars for a basic split up to around 15,000 dollars for ducted whole-home, and that upfront cost takes several years of running-cost savings to repay. Ripping out a working heater mid-life for running cost alone usually does not pay. In an existing home a working gas heater is not banned and does not have to be removed. The honest move is to switch to reverse cycle when you are buying new or when the gas heater dies, not before.
It is cheaper for most households in most states, but not a universal absolute. SolarQuotes' own per-capital gas prices show the gap swings with location: gas is around 5.6 cents per kilowatt-hour in Melbourne and 8.1 in Sydney but around 14.8 in Brisbane, while grid electricity runs 20 to 35 cents. Where you have cheap gas and an expensive peak-only electricity tariff with no solar, the running-cost advantage narrows. It rarely disappears, but the honest claim is cheaper for most households in most states, not every state. If you have solar or heat during off-peak hours, the reverse-cycle case gets stronger.
CoP, or Coefficient of Performance, is how many units of heat a reverse-cycle system delivers per unit of electricity it uses. ACT Climate Choices figures put split systems at an average CoP around 3.7, up to 6.4 for the best, and ducted systems around 3.5 to 5.0, equivalent to roughly 350 to 640 percent efficiency. It matters because a system with a CoP of 6 uses half the electricity of one with a CoP of 3 to produce the same warmth, so a higher-CoP model directly lowers your running cost. Real-world seasonal CoP drops on the coldest nights, so in cold climates choose a cold-rated unit rather than judging by one headline number.
Where these figures come from.
Every figure on this page traces to a government or independent source below — check them for the current numbers, which drift with energy prices.
- Sustainability Victoria — Calculate heating running costs (mid-2025 annual figures, reverse cycle vs gas vs electric)
- ACT Government Climate Choices — Reverse-cycle systems buyers guide (CoP figures, 50m2 cost table, H2 cold-climate rating)
- energy.gov.au — Heating and cooling (federal: reverse cycle 300-600% efficient, heat pumps cheapest to run)
- CHOICE — What's the cheapest way to heat your home this winter (running costs, upfront-cost caveat)
- SolarQuotes — Air conditioners vs gas heating (gas efficiency %, AC efficiency %, per-capital gas prices)