Sigenergy SigenStor: 5, 8, 10 or 12 kW?
Sigenergy sells the same stack in five inverter sizes, in single-phase and three-phase, with two battery modules and two completely different EV chargers. Most of those choices are made for you by your switchboard and your network — not by your budget. Here is what actually separates them, from the Australian datasheet.
Written by Juan Flinn, Content Editor · Reviewed by the Mission Green Energy Team · Updated August 2026
The short answer, before the tables.
The inverter size is set by your solar array and your phase supply, not by your battery. Every SigenStor Energy Controller from 5.0 to 12.0 takes the same battery modules and stacks the same one to six of them, so picking a bigger inverter does not buy you more storage — it buys you more solar input and more output power.
If you are on single-phase and want the standard 5 kW export approval most Australian networks grant without extra paperwork, the 5.0 SP is the one. If you have a large array, the 8.0 SP and above give you more MPPT channels to run more roof orientations. And if you are on three-phase, you are choosing from an entirely different product — the Sigen Hybrid TP2 — which shares the name but not the electrical design.
There is an active recall on three of these models.
Recall PRA 2025/20703, published 19 November 2025, covers SigenStor EC 8.0, 10.0 and 12.0 kW SP AU single-phase energy controllers fitted with quick-connect AC plugs, sold between 4 March and 18 November 2025. The AC plug may overheat and become damaged, posing a fire risk. No property damage or injuries were reported at publication.
Three-phase units are not included. Neither is the 5.0 or 6.0 SP. Units sold after 18 November 2025 are outside the recall dates.
The remedy is an interim firmware update followed by a free replacement unit with a redesigned AC plug, plus an extra two years of warranty. Your retailer or Sigenergy arranges it — sigenservice.au@sigenergy.com.
We are naming this on a page that recommends those exact models because you should hear it from us before you hear it from a competitor. It does not make the 8.0, 10.0 or 12.0 a bad choice today — a recall that is being fixed properly, with an extended warranty attached, tells you more about a manufacturer than one that never happens. Our full recalls and warnings checklist tracks this one alongside every other current Australian battery recall.
How the five single-phase sizes actually differ.
These are the published figures for the SigenStor Energy Controller in single-phase, as listed in Sigenergy's Australian datasheet. Two numbers matter more than the model name: max PV power, which caps the array you can bolt on, and number of MPP trackers, which decides how many separately-behaving roof faces you can run.
| SigenStor EC | 5.0 SP | 6.0 SP | 8.0 SP | 10.0 SP | 12.0 SP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Max PV power | 10,000 W | 12,000 W | 16,000 W | 20,000 W | 24,000 W |
| Nominal AC output | 4,999 W | 6,000 W | 8,000 W | 9,999 W | 12,000 W |
| Max apparent power | 4,999 VA | 6,600 VA | 8,800 VA | 9,999 VA | 12,000 VA |
| MPP trackers | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Nominal output current | 21.7 A | 27.3 A | 36.4 A | 43.4 A | 54.6 A |
| Max output current | 21.7 A | 30.0 A | 40.0 A | 43.4 A | 54.6 A |
The 4,999 W and 9,999 W are not typos.
The 5.0 SP is rated 4,999 W and the 10.0 SP 9,999 W. That single watt is deliberate. Australian distribution networks write their approval thresholds as "not more than 5 kW" and "not more than 10 kW" per phase, and a unit rated at exactly 5,000 W can land on the wrong side of a literal reading. Rating it one watt under removes the argument. It tells you something useful about the product: it was engineered for the Australian approval process, not merely shipped here.
The practical consequence is that if your network allows 5 kW of inverter capacity on a single phase without a special application, the 5.0 SP fits that allowance exactly, with nothing to negotiate.
What the extra MPP trackers are really for.
The 5.0 and 6.0 have two MPP trackers. The 8.0 has three. The 10.0 and 12.0 have four. An MPP tracker is an independent optimiser for one group of panels, and you need a separate one for every roof face that behaves differently — different direction, different pitch, or different shading through the day.
A simple north-facing roof needs two at most. A house with north, east and west arrays needs three. A complex roof with four orientations, or one where a tree shades one string every afternoon, is the honest case for the 10.0 or 12.0 — not because you need 12 kW of output, but because you need the fourth tracker. This is the most common reason we specify a bigger unit than the customer expected.
Where the sizes are electrically identical.
All five single-phase units share a 600 V maximum DC input, a 50–550 V MPPT range, and a 300–600 V battery module range. They take the same battery modules, one to six per controller. So there is no storage penalty for choosing the 5.0 — a 5.0 SP with six modules holds exactly as much as a 12.0 SP with six modules.
These are two different products wearing one name.
This is the distinction most buyers miss. The single-phase unit is a SigenStor Energy Controller (SP). The three-phase unit is a Sigen Hybrid (TP2). Same power ratings on the box, materially different electrical design underneath.
| At the same 12 kW rating | SigenStor EC 12.0 SP | Sigen Hybrid 12.0 TP2 |
|---|---|---|
| Nominal AC output | 12,000 W | 12,000 W |
| Max apparent power | 12,000 VA | 13,200 VA |
| Nominal output current | 54.6 A | 18.2 A per phase |
| Max output current | 54.6 A | 20.1 A per phase |
| Max DC input voltage | 600 V | 1,100 V |
| MPPT voltage range | 50 – 550 V | 160 – 1,000 V |
| MPP trackers | 4 | 2 |
| Battery module voltage | 300 – 600 V | 600 – 900 V |
| Backup peak (10 s) | Not listed in this table | 24,000 W |
The current figure is the whole story.
54.6 A versus 18.2 A. Both deliver 12 kW, but the single-phase unit pushes it all down one conductor while the three-phase unit splits it across three. That single row explains most of the practical differences: cable sizing, switchboard load, voltage rise along your street, and how gently the system sits on the grid.
Voltage rise is the one that bites Australian households. When your inverter exports hard on a single phase, it lifts the voltage at your connection point. Lift it far enough and the inverter must throttle back or trip off to stay inside AS/NZS 4777.2 limits — so you lose the export you paid for, usually on the sunniest days. Spreading the same power across three phases cuts the current per conductor to roughly a third and largely removes that pressure.
Higher DC voltage means longer strings.
The three-phase unit accepts up to 1,100 V DC against 600 V for single-phase, with an MPPT range running to 1,000 V. In practice that means more panels in series per string, which suits larger arrays and longer cable runs from a shed or a distant roof. The trade-off is that it carries two MPP trackers rather than four, so it handles fewer independent roof orientations.
Which one you get is usually not a choice.
If your home has a single-phase supply, you use the single-phase unit unless you pay to upgrade the service — which means a network application, a new mains cable and often a switchboard rebuild. That is rarely worth doing for storage alone. If you already have three-phase, the TP2 is almost always the better engineering answer, and it becomes close to mandatory if you want to run three-phase loads through backup.
The honest test: check your main switch. Three separate poles feeding the main switch means three-phase. One means single-phase. If you are unsure, a photo of the switchboard settles it in seconds — send us one and we will tell you which product line applies before anyone quotes you.
BAT 5.0 and BAT 8.0 — and why neither name is the number that matters.
SigenStor takes two battery modules, and you stack one to six of them on any controller. The model names are rounded, and the figure that decides your federal rebate is neither of them.
| Battery module | SigenStor BAT 5.0 | SigenStor BAT 8.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Total energy capacity | 5.38 kWh | 8.06 kWh |
| Usable energy capacity | 5.2 kWh | 7.8 kWh |
| Weight | 18 kg | 36 kg |
| Dimensions (W/H/D) | 700 / 300 / 245 mm | 700 / 300 / 260 mm |
| Cooling | Natural convection | Smart air cooling |
| Modules per controller | 1 – 6 | 1 – 6 |
| Max stack (6 modules, usable) | 31.2 kWh | 46.8 kWh |
"5.0" is neither 5.38 nor 5.2.
The BAT 5.0 holds 5.38 kWh total and delivers 5.2 kWh usable. The BAT 8.0 holds 8.06 kWh total and delivers 7.8 kWh usable. The name sits between the two figures and matches neither, which is normal across the industry and is exactly why we keep a separate guide on usable versus nominal capacity.
It matters here for one concrete reason: the federal battery rebate is calculated on usable capacity. Quote a stack by its model names and you will overstate both the storage and the rebate.
What a six-module stack means for your rebate.
Six BAT 8.0 modules give 46.8 kWh usable, not the 48 kWh the rounded names imply. Under the tiered federal scheme that stack spans all three rebate bands rather than sitting in one, so the certificates it earns are worth much less per kilowatt-hour at the top than at the bottom. Six BAT 5.0 modules give 31.2 kWh usable and cross into the lowest band by only a little.
Neither is a reason to avoid a big stack — but it is a reason to size the last two modules on what they save you rather than on the rebate. Our guide to the rebate tiers works through where the value stops.
The 36 kg difference is an install detail with consequences.
A BAT 5.0 is 18 kg; a BAT 8.0 is 36 kg — double, for roughly 50% more usable energy. Six BAT 8.0 modules put over 200 kg of battery on one wall before the controller. On brick that is routine. On a stud wall, a clad frame, or anything the installer cannot verify, it needs checking before the quote, not on install day. The BAT 5.0 also runs on natural convection while the BAT 8.0 uses smart air cooling, which is worth knowing if the stack is going somewhere noise carries.
Both modules are IP66 and the range is certified to AS/NZS 4777.2:2020+A1:2024, so outdoor mounting is supported.
The two Sigenergy EV chargers are not competing products.
Sigenergy sells an AC charger and a DC charging module, and they solve different problems. Buying the wrong one is expensive, because the DC unit costs multiples of the AC one and most households never use what it does.
| Sigen EVAC 7 | Sigen EVAC 11 | Sigen EVAC 22 | SigenStor EVDC 12 | SigenStor EVDC 25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | AC | AC | AC | DC | DC |
| Charging power | 7 kW | 11 kW | 22 kW | 12.5 kW | 25 kW |
| Supply required | Single-phase | Three-phase | Three-phase | Either | Either |
| Current range | 6 – 32 A | 6 – 16 A | 6 – 32 A | 40 A max | 80 A max |
| Connector | Type 2 | Type 2 | Type 2 | CCS2 | CCS2 |
| Discharge to home (V2X) | No | No | No | 12.5 kW | 25 kW |
The AC chargers: 7 kW unless you have three phases.
The EVAC 7 runs on a single-phase 220–240 V supply at 6–32 A. The EVAC 11 and EVAC 22 both need three-phase. So on a single-phase home the decision is made for you: 7 kW, which adds roughly 40 km of range an hour and fills any normal commute overnight several times over.
Note the odd pairing in the middle: the EVAC 11 tops out at 16 A per phase while the EVAC 22 runs to 32 A. If you have three-phase and the switchboard capacity, the 22 is the more capable unit; the 11 exists for supplies that cannot give 32 A per phase.
The DC module is about discharging, not charging.
The SigenStor EVDC comes in 12.5 kW and 25 kW, both bidirectional, running 150–1,000 V over CCS2. The charging speed is the least interesting thing about it. The point is the second row: it discharges at the same rate, so the car becomes a battery for the house.
An EV pack is typically several times the size of a home battery. Being able to draw 25 kW back out of it changes what a blackout looks like, and it changes what an evening peak costs. That is a genuinely different proposition from an AC charger.
Who should honestly skip it.
V2X only works if your specific vehicle supports bidirectional DC over CCS2, and in Australia in 2026 most do not. Before anyone quotes you an EVDC, the question to answer is not "how fast does it charge" but "does my car discharge, and is that supported here today?" If the answer is no, or not yet, the EVAC 7 plus a larger battery stack is the better spend — and we will tell you so. Our V2L versus home battery guide works through where each one wins.
Your battery modules, not your inverter, decide your backup power.
This is the single most useful line in the whole datasheet, and it almost never appears in a quote. Each BAT 5.0 module can deliver 2,500 W. Each BAT 8.0 module can deliver 4,000 W. Those are per-module limits on charge and discharge alike.
So a 12.0 SP inverter paired with two BAT 5.0 modules cannot produce 12 kW from storage. It can produce 5 kW, because that is what two modules are capable of pushing. The inverter is not the bottleneck — the stack is.
| Modules in the stack | BAT 5.0 (2,500 W each) | BAT 8.0 (4,000 W each) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 modules | 5,000 W | 8,000 W |
| 3 modules | 7,500 W | 12,000 W |
| 4 modules | 10,000 W | 16,000 W |
| 5 modules | 12,500 W | 20,000 W |
| 6 modules | 15,000 W | 24,000 W |
What this means when you size a system.
To get a 12.0 SP inverter's full 12 kW out of the battery during a blackout you need five BAT 5.0 modules or three BAT 8.0 modules. Anything less and the inverter's headline rating is capacity you paid for and cannot use after dark.
It also runs the other way. If your evening peak is a 2.4 kW ducted system plus an oven, two BAT 8.0 modules cover it comfortably at 8,000 W, and a 12 kW inverter adds nothing to that scenario. Solar input, not battery output, would be the reason to go bigger.
The honest way to size this is to add up what you actually want running when the grid drops — not what the inverter could theoretically do. If a quote pairs a large inverter with a small stack, ask what the system delivers on battery alone. That number should be in the proposal, and it usually is not.
What the spec sheet says carefully, and what it leaves out.
"100% depth of discharge" needs its footnote.
The datasheet advertises 100% depth of discharge, and the footnote attached to it clarifies that this refers to the usable energy capacity. Both statements are true together: you can draw down the full usable figure, and the usable figure is 5.2 kWh of a 5.38 kWh pack. It is not a claim that you get all 5.38 kWh.
That is a fair way to describe an LFP battery, and Sigenergy states both numbers plainly, which is more than several competitors do. But "100% DoD" and "5.2 of 5.38 kWh" describe the same battery, and only one of them makes it into most sales conversations.
10,000 cycles is a conditional figure.
The modules use LiFePO4 chemistry with 280 Ah cells and a stated cycle life of 10,000 cycles, carrying a footnote for the test conditions. Cycle-life ratings are always measured at a specific depth, temperature and rate, and Australian conditions — a battery on a west wall through a Perth or Adelaide summer — are not laboratory conditions. Treat 10,000 as the ceiling under ideal use, not a promise.
The warranty term is not in the datasheet.
Worth saying plainly: the Australian datasheet we have quoted throughout this page does not state a warranty period. It links to a warranty lookup instead. Any warranty figure you are quoted should be confirmed against Sigenergy's own current warranty document for the Australian market, with the version and date on it, before you sign.
That is not a knock on the product — it is how most manufacturers now handle warranty, because terms change by market and by year. It does mean a warranty claim in a sales deck is not a specification, and we would not treat it as one. Our guide to what battery warranties actually cover explains which clauses decide whether a claim gets paid.
What is certified.
The range is listed to AS/NZS 4777.2:2020+A1:2024, the Australian grid-connection standard, and the modules are IP66. Both matter for approval and for outdoor mounting. Anything sold here without current AS/NZS 4777.2 compliance cannot be legally grid-connected, so this is a floor rather than a feature.
Sigenergy SigenStor sizes
FAQ.
Neither is better in the abstract — the size is set by your solar array and your phase supply, not your budget. Every SigenStor Energy Controller from 5.0 to 12.0 takes the same battery modules and stacks one to six of them, so a bigger inverter buys more solar input and more output power, never more storage. On single-phase with an ordinary roof, the 5.0 SP is rated 4,999 W to sit inside the standard 5 kW network allowance. The 10.0 and 12.0 are usually specified for their fourth MPP tracker, which lets you run four separately-behaving roof faces, rather than for their output.
Yes. Recall PRA 2025/20703, published 19 November 2025, covers SigenStor EC 8.0, 10.0 and 12.0 kW SP AU single-phase energy controllers with quick-connect AC plugs, sold between 4 March and 18 November 2025. The AC plug may overheat and become damaged, posing a fire risk, and no property damage or injuries were reported at publication. Three-phase units are not included, nor are the 5.0 or 6.0 SP, and units sold after 18 November 2025 fall outside the recall dates. The remedy is an interim firmware update followed by a free replacement unit with a redesigned plug plus two extra years of warranty, arranged through your retailer or Sigenergy.
It is deliberate, not a typo. Australian distribution networks write approval thresholds as 'not more than 5 kW' per phase, and a unit rated at exactly 5,000 W can fall on the wrong side of a literal reading. Rating it one watt under removes the argument entirely. The 10.0 SP is rated 9,999 W for the same reason. It indicates the product was engineered around the Australian approval process rather than simply shipped here.
They are two different products sharing one brand name: the single-phase unit is a SigenStor Energy Controller (SP) and the three-phase unit is a Sigen Hybrid (TP2). At the same 12 kW rating the single-phase pushes 54.6 A down one conductor while the three-phase splits it into 18.2 A per phase. The three-phase unit also accepts 1,100 V DC against 600 V, so strings can be longer, but carries two MPP trackers against four. Lower current per phase means less voltage rise, which is what causes an inverter to throttle its export on sunny days.
The SigenStor BAT 5.0 holds 5.38 kWh total and delivers 5.2 kWh usable. The BAT 8.0 holds 8.06 kWh total and delivers 7.8 kWh usable. In both cases the model name sits between the two figures and matches neither. This matters in Australia because the federal battery rebate is calculated on usable capacity, so quoting a stack by its model names overstates both the storage and the rebate.
Each BAT 5.0 module delivers 2,500 W and each BAT 8.0 module delivers 4,000 W, on charge and discharge alike. These are per-module limits, so the stack size — not the inverter rating — decides your backup power. A 12.0 SP inverter with two BAT 5.0 modules can only produce 5,000 W from storage. Reaching that inverter's full 12 kW on battery requires five BAT 5.0 modules or three BAT 8.0 modules.
One to six modules per controller, and the limit is the same on every inverter size from 5.0 to 12.0. Six BAT 8.0 modules give 46.8 kWh usable — not the 48 kWh the rounded names imply — and six BAT 5.0 modules give 31.2 kWh usable. A six-module BAT 8.0 stack also weighs over 200 kg before the controller, which needs checking against the wall it is going on before the quote rather than on install day.
Yes, with the footnote the datasheet attaches to it: the 100% figure refers to the usable energy capacity, not the total pack. You can draw the full usable figure, and that figure is 5.2 kWh of a 5.38 kWh pack on the BAT 5.0. Both statements are true together. Sigenergy states the total and usable numbers plainly, which is more than several competitors do, but '100% DoD' and '5.2 of 5.38 kWh' describe the same battery.
For nearly every Australian household, the AC charger. The Sigen EVAC 7 runs on single-phase at 7 kW, adding roughly 40 km of range an hour, which covers any normal commute overnight. The SigenStor EVDC at 12.5 or 25 kW is bidirectional over CCS2, so its real purpose is discharging the car back into the house, not charging speed. That only works if your specific vehicle supports bidirectional DC, and in Australia in 2026 most do not. If your car cannot discharge, an EVAC 7 plus a larger battery stack is the better spend.
For the 11 kW and 22 kW AC chargers, yes — the Sigen EVAC 11 and EVAC 22 both require a three-phase supply. The EVAC 7 runs on a standard single-phase 220–240 V supply at 6–32 A. Note that the EVAC 11 is limited to 16 A per phase while the EVAC 22 runs to 32 A, so the 11 exists for supplies that cannot deliver 32 A per phase rather than as a middle-ground upgrade.
The Australian datasheet does not state a warranty period — it links to a warranty lookup instead. Any warranty figure quoted to you should be confirmed against Sigenergy's own current Australian warranty document, with its version and date, before you sign. This is now common across manufacturers because terms change by market and by year, but it does mean a warranty claim in a sales deck is not a specification.
So which SigenStor is right for you?
Single-phase, ordinary roof, standard export approval: the 5.0 SP. Its 4,999 W rating is built for exactly this, and a 10 kW array fits inside its 10,000 W PV limit.
Single-phase, big array or two roof faces: the 8.0 SP for its third MPP tracker and 16,000 W PV ceiling.
Single-phase, complex roof with three or four orientations: the 10.0 SP or 12.0 SP — bought for the fourth tracker, not the output.
Three-phase supply: the Sigen Hybrid TP2 at whatever size matches your array. The drop from 54.6 A to 18.2 A per phase is worth having on its own, and it is the only route to three-phase backup.
Storage: size it on your evening load, not on the rebate. BAT 8.0 modules cost less per usable kilowatt-hour; BAT 5.0 modules are easier on a wall and quieter.
EV charging: EVAC 7 for nearly everyone. EVDC only if your car genuinely supports bidirectional DC today.
If a salesperson quotes you a 12 kW inverter for a simple north-facing roof on single-phase, ask which of the four MPP trackers you are actually using. It is a fair question and the answer is often "one".